Full 2L QBank
Surgery General 411f124c

A 32-year-old G3P20L2 presents to the obstetrician's office for a routine OB visit at 30 weeks. She has had no complications during the pregnancy and has had regular prenatal care. Her gestational age is confirmed with a first-trimester sonogram. During the routine OB visit, the fundal height measures 35 cm. All of the following can explain the size-date discrepancy except

A
The 5-cm difference is within the error for fundal height measurements
B
Leiomyomas
C
Polyhydramnios
D
Fetal macrosomia
High-Yield Explanation
(Gabbe, 2/e, p 230.) Uterine fibroids, polyhydram- nios (excessive amniotic fluid), fetal macrosomia, and twin gestation are all plausible explanations of why the uterine size would measure larger than expected for the patient's dates. It is unlikely, but possible, that a twin gestation would have been missed with an early sonogram. The fundal height in centimeters has been found to correlate with gestational age in weeks with an error of 3 cm from 16 to 38 weeks.

Related Surgery MCQs

Practice 2,00,000+ NEET PG Questions Free

Timed mock tests, mistake queue analytics, audio lectures & zero attempt limits on i❤️Exams.

Start Free Mock Test Now